Self Hosted Server


I have been searching for many possible options to do an AI in my house. There are so many to use obviously and many that are being developed. I have been looking for a completely open platform like Mycroft. Now the only thing I doubt is being worked on that id like to see implemented if possible is that id like to see a Mycroft personal hosted server. I’d like to have my own personal Jarvis with my own variation of modifications while at the same time saving my data in my own cloud. Would it be possible to get a self-hosted server that I can hook clients to like my car and my phone and even my computers? Then maybe that server could be updated from Mycroft’s` server directly. Idk I guess I’m posting this as a suggestion. I see my future house as having Mycroft capability on the walls in every aspect of my house as well as my car. The only way I see this working out is if I can obtain an AI server to hook individual clients to directly. It would make it so much easier for me to do implimenation. As well as the fact I’d really like to retain all my own information. The only thing that hs held me back from preordering a device is because I feel like I may lose out on such a feature just like I did on my Echo and other sources that I’ve tested. I guess just keep it in mind, I can’t wait to see where the project ends up going. thanks, guys!


This is exactly my question/area of interest as well.


Yeah. I don’t feel comfortable to open my house to other company. I would like to host my own data in my own server as well.


Yes, I think this is an important topic. Having the ability to have my services on my server (for me, my company, family) is very important.

Are there any plans to go into that direction?


The only types of things i have read are their statements about being concerned with security. They talked about how its as important to them as it is to us. But one of the biggest reasons i was considering jasper over this project is due to the fact i could host it in house and never have to hook up to a server if i do not want to. I feel like this is so important to the success of Mycroft. For them to make it in such away that it can be updated and stored entirely locally. But at the same time how its important to have a client/server style ability in order to make a voice assistant more of a complete automation solution.


It is possible to run mycroft standalone, with a few tweaks, some things do require api s such as wolfram alpha and open weather map, etc. We use Google STT (untill we can get OpenSTT off of the ground) but there is an outstanding PR here to use a local Kaldi server, check it out!


Hi all!
I want to run Mycroft standalone for contributing to it in this mode.
I tested PiCroft, tweaked configs and it seemed fine (i.e. PiCroft not talking to Home). As I’m also interested in local STT server and Pi doesn’t seem to be able to handle Kaldi (correct me if I’m wrong) due to higher computation resources that Pi can offer, I switched to Ubuntu installation.
It went ok, I made it to install Kaldi, tweak configs but I’ve got two issues now:

  1. mycroft.client.speech.listener - ERROR - global name 'requests' is not defined followed by mycroft.client.speech.listener - ERROR - Speech Recognition could not understand audio: I couldn’t find out why that seems to be a problem (mycroft-core version: 0.8.13) to import requests?
  2. When changed server entries in mycroft.conf to the following:
    "server": { "url": "", "version": "v1", "update": false, "metrics": false }, Ubuntu-based installation keeps trying to connect to the server (resulting in: ConnectionError: HTTPSConnectionPool(host='', port=443): Max retries exceeded with url: /v1/device//setting (Caused by NewConnectionError('<requests.packages.urllib3.connection.VerifiedHTTPSConnection object at 0x7f7ca2748490>: Failed to establish a new connection: [Errno 111] Connection refused',)), from /usr/lib/python2.7/", line 801, in __bootstrap_inner through /opt/mycroft/skills/skill-configuration/", line 55, in notify all the way down to ~/.virtualenvs/mycroft/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/requests/", line 487, in send
    I believe one of skills could insist on connecting to the Mycroft API but I did set false for proxy parameter of Weather and WolframAlpha skills (the ones using API keys based on Mycroft servers, if I’m now wrong).

I hope fixing the above will let me test the local Kaldi STT and I’ll be happy to share all of it, e.g. on Github (I followed the PR#440 / Issue-438 when setting things up, using docker image of Kaldi gstreamer server).


This is a must in my opinion for mycroft to reach its adoption goals… in one hand you have many people who are tired of companies mining data which is why they stay away from products like Nest, Echo, Alexa, Cortana, Siri etc…They are also tired of the fact that its only a matter of time before your cloud is breached. When it comes to a device that is listening 24/7 most people from this camp do not want large corporations holding their data in the cloud.

there are many startups across the board who recognize this trend and as such are taking customer base away from the big data minging companies because they actually respect their customers privacy… So you will miss out on not only these privacy concerned people but also the companies who wish to use your tech to build a product that is privacy focused.

Personally, I do not use any AI or speech recognition products not even on my cell. That is why mycroft caught my attention but I am glad I found this thread before beying the device. I don’t want a product that sends data to google or microsoft.

So I will patiently wait to see how you guys solve these issues concerning the anti data mining movement… Not quite sure where everyone lost their minds and decided it was okay for large corporations to mine everything about us including in our homes without our permission and in some cases “opt-out” it should be opt in, privacy in our homes is a basic human right and should not be infringed.


I found this, high speed and good accuracy its kaldi on steroids this:


Sorry I am late to the Party.
For a system that claims not to collect your data, a self hosted home server is a must.
Has there been any progress on the topic?


Thanks so much for your feedback, @Chris_Schantz - and for your ideas on home automation. A lot of the people who use Mycroft use it in conjunction with tools like Home Assistant .

Having a full self-hosted version of Mycroft is possible at the moment, but doing so is not well-documented and requires significant technical expertise. In summary, you would need to replicate a lot of the functionality of - which abstracts a whole bunch of API requests and manages Device settings.

It is definitely one of our most requested features, and is something we’re working towards, but don’t have a target date as yet. Our key challenges in this space are obviously on-board STT. At the moment our default STT engine does processing in the cloud, because the on-board processing power of the RPi 3 B is not super great. We want to use DeepSpeech see here for blog post, but the on-board processor needs to be a bit gruntier to do that.

But yes, a frequently-requested architectural feature!

Best, Kathy